(1) Review Articles

John S. Kloppenborg, "On dispensing with Q?: Goodacre on the relation of Luke to Matthew", New Testament studies 49 (2003): 210 - 236
Reproduced on-line at http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~kloppen/2003mwqh.pdf

Paul Foster, “Is it Possible to Dispense with Q?”, Novum Testamentum 45 (2003): 313-37

Allan J. McNicol, "Has Goulder Sunk Q?: An Assessment of Mark Goodacre's Goulder and the Gospels: An Examination of a New Paradigm", paper read to the Synoptic Problem Seminar at SNTS Birmingham, August 1997, now reproduced on The Two Gospel Hypothesis Home Page; available as an HTML document (previous link) or a PDF file

Frans Neirynck, "Goulder and the Minor Agreements", ETL 73 (1997), pp. 84-93

(2) Reviews of The Case Against Q

Peter J. Williams, Scottish Journal of Theology 59 (2006): 362-4

Christopher Tuckett, Review of The Case Against Q, Novum Testamentum 46 (2004): 401-3

Richard B. Vinson, Review of The Case Against Q, Theology Today April 2004, reproduced on-line at http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3664/is_200404/ai_n9374269

Daniel E. Goodman, Review of The Case Against Q, Catholic Biblical Quarterly 65 (2003): 125-6
Reproduced on-line at http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3679/is_200301/ai_n9176998

W. Barnes Tatum, Review of The Case Against Q, Interpretation 57 (2003): 324

John Dart, Review of The Case Against Q, Christian Century 120 (2003): 38
Reproduced on-line at http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1058/is_1_120/ai_96555090

Cyril Rodd, Review of The Case Against Q, Journal of Theological Studies 54 (2003): 687-91

John S. Kloppenborg, Review of The Case Against Q, Review of Biblical Literature [http://www.bookreviews.org] (2002)

Leo Percer, Review of The Case Against Q, Review of Biblical Literature [http://www.bookreviews.org] (2002)

James A. Cox, Review of The Case Against Q in MidWest Book Review Internet Bookwatch, April 2002 [http://www.midwestbookreview.com]

(3) Reviews of The Synoptic Problem: A Way Through the Maze

Mark Matson, Review of The Synoptic Problem: A Way Through the Maze, Review of Biblical Literature [http://www.bookreviews.org] (2004)

Cyril Rodd, Review of The Synoptic Problem: A Way Through the Maze, Expository Times 114 (2003): 426

F. Gerald Downing, Theology 106 (2003): 353-4 (reviewed with Case Against Q and David Neville, Mark’s Gospel: Prior or Posterior?)

David Wenham, Themelios 28.3 (2003): 83-4

(4) Reviews of Goulder and the Gospels

Albert Fuchs, Review of Goulder and the Gospels, Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 25 (2000): 272-5

Kevin Ellis, Review of Goulder and the Gospels, Themelios 24:2 (February 1999): 63

Stephen Greenhalgh, Review of Goulder and the Gospels, Scripture Bulletin 28/1 (January 1998): 46-8

Robert Gundry, Review of Goulder and the Gospels, SBL Review of Biblical Literature 1998; also in JBL 117 (1998): 742-4

Christopher Tuckett, Review of Goulder and the Gospels, JTS 49 (1998), pp. 233-7

(5) Other

F. Gerald Downing, "Dissolving the Synoptic Problem Through Film?", JSNT 84 (2001), pp. 117-9

Proceed to Media . . .